{"id":4081,"date":"2012-10-16T10:55:00","date_gmt":"2012-10-16T09:55:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.clairejannot.com\/?p=4081"},"modified":"2014-11-15T13:15:23","modified_gmt":"2014-11-15T12:15:23","slug":"fukushima-les-mensonges-de-tepco","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/claire-jannot.com\/?p=4081","title":{"rendered":"Fukushima : Les mensonges de Tepco"},"content":{"rendered":"

Fukushima : Tepco admet avoir minimis\u00e9 les risques pour ne pas alarmer la population.<\/span>Vendredi 12 octobre 2012, \u00e0 l’occasion de la pr\u00e9sentation de sa strat\u00e9gie fondamentale de r\u00e9forme de son dispositif nucl\u00e9aire,<\/span>\u00a0Tepco a annonc\u00e9 avoir minimis\u00e9 le risque de tsunami\u00a0<\/span>par peur d’une fermeture de la centrale pour am\u00e9liorer la s\u00e9curit\u00e9.<\/span><\/h2>\n

\"\"<\/a>Le document pr\u00e9cise notamment que l’op\u00e9rateur de la centrale nucl\u00e9aire de Fukushima n’avait pas pris les mesures n\u00e9cessaires<\/strong> afin de pouvoir faire face \u00e0 une telle catastrophe.<\/span><\/p>\n

Ne pas inqui\u00e9ter les populations riveraines :\u00a0<\/span>En cause,\u00a0\u00ab\u00a0la crainte que la mise en \u0153uvre de mesures suppl\u00e9mentaires afin de pr\u00e9venir un accident s\u00e9v\u00e8re puisse r\u00e9pandre une inqui\u00e9tude chez la population locale au sujet des conditions de s\u00fbret\u00e9 des centrales actuelles\u00a0\u00bb<\/strong>. Et le rapport de r\u00e9pondre \u00e0 trois questions :<\/span><\/p>\n

Des mesures suppl\u00e9mentaires auraient-elles pu \u00eatre prises au regard des \u00e9valuations du risque de tsunami dont disposait Tepco ?\u00a0\u00ab\u00a0Il \u00e9tait possible d’agir, conform\u00e9ment au principe de la d\u00e9fense en profondeur\u00a0\u00bb<\/strong>, indique le rapport.<\/span><\/p>\n

Un renforcement r\u00e9gulier, depuis 2002, des mesures en cas d’accident s\u00e9v\u00e8re aurait-il permis de r\u00e9duire l’impact de la catastrophe ?\u00a0\u00ab\u00a0Il \u00e9tait possible de diversifier les syst\u00e8mes de s\u00fbret\u00e9 en r\u00e9alisant un suivi r\u00e9gulier des mesures prises dans d’autres pays\u00a0\u00bb<\/strong>, estime le rapport qui explique que Tepco n’avait pas pris en compte le retour d’exp\u00e9rience de la perte de source \u00e9lectrique externe de la centrale nucl\u00e9aire du Blayais (Gironde), suite \u00e0 l’inondation caus\u00e9e par la temp\u00eate de d\u00e9cembre 1999. ( Ca c’est chez nous ! )\u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Etait-il possible de limiter les impacts pendant l’accident ?\u00a0\u00ab\u00a0Plut\u00f4t que de faire des entrainements formels, une organisation avec une capacit\u00e9 pratique de gestion des accidents disposant de mat\u00e9riels et d’\u00e9quipements aurait d\u00fb \u00eatre \u00e9tablie et exp\u00e9riment\u00e9e\u00a0\u00bb<\/strong>, admet l’op\u00e9rateur japonais.<\/span><\/p>\n

La suite de l’ article sur :\u00a0http:\/\/www.actu-environnement.com<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Source : Philippe Collet\u00a9 Tous droits r\u00e9serv\u00e9s Actu-Environnement<\/span><\/address>\n
Cr\u00e9dit photo :\u00a0afp.com\/David Guttenfelder<\/span><\/address>\n
\u00a0<\/address>\n
\u00a0<\/address>\n
\u00a0<\/address>\n
\u00a0<\/address>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Fukushima : Tepco admet avoir minimis\u00e9 les risques pour ne pas alarmer la population.Vendredi 12 octobre 2012, \u00e0 l’occasion de la pr\u00e9sentation de sa strat\u00e9gie fondamentale de r\u00e9forme de son dispositif nucl\u00e9aire,\u00a0Tepco a annonc\u00e9 avoir minimis\u00e9 le risque de tsunami\u00a0par … Continuer la lecture →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[2],"tags":[4,44,5,12,6,10],"class_list":["post-4081","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ecologie","tag-ecologie2","tag-energie","tag-environnement","tag-fukushima","tag-nucleaire","tag-sante"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p5jjt5-13P","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/claire-jannot.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4081","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/claire-jannot.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/claire-jannot.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/claire-jannot.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/claire-jannot.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4081"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/claire-jannot.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4081\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5657,"href":"https:\/\/claire-jannot.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4081\/revisions\/5657"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/claire-jannot.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4081"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/claire-jannot.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4081"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/claire-jannot.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4081"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}